FOUR BIG ROOT SOCIAL PROBLEMS TO WORK ON RIGHT NOW Brent Emerson brent@oxhouse.org 2003-2008 U.S. Electoral Reform | Economic Democracy Population Control | Intellectual Property Let's assume that we want to make world society into a system characterized by sustainable, just, comfortable and beautiful relationships between humans, other animals, plants, other biotic features, and other abiotic features. What are the most immediate root problems impeding our progress toward this goal? And what can we do (aside from generally supporting and participating in practices that we believe are just and sustainable) to overcome them? Here are my ideas: (1) The government of the United States of America, the most wealthy and powerful nation on the Earth, is elected via a process that (given its current diverse citizenry) is undemocratic and produces inaccurate representation. [Witness the 2000 presidential election, in which slightly more voters selected the loser than had selected the winner. What's more, significantly more voters selected "progressive" and "liberal" candidates than selected "conservative" candidates, yet the most popular conservative candidate won.] Because of (a) the advantage given by our media systems to candidates who have most money to spend on their campaigns, and (b) the outdated technical assumptions built into our voting models, our election system concentrates a massive amount of power into the hands of a group of people who should not have it, assuming we believe that representative democracy is just. CORE BECAUSE: We spend a lot of time campaigning and voting for mainstream and sub-mainstream and fringe party candidates for many different levels of office, hoping to eventually influence government policy in many important areas. Our means are educating and outreaching to voters, which assumes that our leaders will be elected by the will of the voters. This is not the case - the system underlying our electoral process is broken. Until we fix it, most political investment is wasted and may even be counterproductive. SOLUTION: (a) Campaign finance reform. If candidates were given equal access to the citizenry, and their campaigns limited as to expenditure or contributions from powerful wealthy entities, voters would get the information they need to make an informed decision as to their preferences. (b) Structural voting reform. If Instant Runoff Voting and Choice Voting schemes were adopted and the Electoral College eliminated, the preferences expressed by voters would be much more accurately expressed in the leaders they elected. (c) Other election reforms: Election day holidays, Election-day registration, uniform ID requirements, voting by mail, transparent and verifiable election technology, felon re-enfranchisement, etc. ACTION ITEMS: (a) Lobby your elected officials to support campaign finance reform. Support advocacy groups working on this issue. (b) Educate yourself and other people about alternative voting models. Use them on as many small levels as possible - in your homes and businesses. Encourage your local government to study or adopt them at the city and county level. Lobby your elected representatives to study or adopt them at the state and federal level. Support the work of advocacy organizations working on this issue - the Center for Voting and Democracy (www.fairvote.org) is a good place to start. (c) Support election reform campaigns! (2) The world's power not held by governments is largely concentrated into large and powerful capitalist corporations and other nondemocratic entities that are given the rights of individual humans without any of the experiences that could create a compassionate being. As a result of their most foundational structures, corporations must aim to constantly profit while disregarding to maximum extent possible the costs paid by society, the physical environment, and other parts of the system they interdepend on. The humans constituting the corporation are forced to participate in this process: if an individual human's intentions collide with corporate goals, the person is removed from office and another springs up to replace them, or the corporation does poorly in the market and may fail; if a corporation fails, another springs up to replace it. Industrial capitalism has done great work for humanity in terms of harnessing the work of generations into ever-faster technological development, enabling the possibility of making human life longer, more satisfying, and more comfortable. Unfortunately, it has also routinely allocated society's resources inefficiently and unjustly, created and enforced a narrow concept of personal interest and identity, and made liberal use of resource sources and waste sinks in careless disregard of the interdependence of all natural systems, including human society. We can do better. CORE BECAUSE: Justice and sustainability are not often maximally profitable for those who make decisions, so corporate decision-making contributes on many different levels to practices that run counter to these values, including: corporate media and the way it educates us about and creates our world; corporate involvement in political campaigns; and corporations' relationships with their employees, physical resources and waste. SOLUTION: Gradually eliminate capitalist corporations by doing most of society's work through cooperative organizing models that build in large-scale conscious behavior flowing democratically from the bottom up rather than large-scale disregard that flows from the top down. ACTION ITEMS: Educate yourself and others about the history of such organizing models. Organize your work and consumption around cooperative principles and transfer your consumption to flow through channels so organized. Research and develop tools and policies by which large-scale organization of labor and consumption is made more efficient and possible. Lobby your elected officials to support legislation which limits capitalist corporations' legal rights and advantages and supports a cooperative economy. (3) There are too many humans! If we follow our current policies and social norms, U.N. projections suggest population will eventually level off at 10-12 billion, or roughly twice our current population. CORE BECAUSE: Many of the society's emerging social and environmental problems boil down to this: the human population of the earth is near its carrying capacity and growing, and we are making more per capita demands of our planet than ever, and so we are running out. Running out of clean water, out of clean atmosphere in which to deposit carbon, out of fuel to power our ever-more-energy-intensive lifestyles, out of arable land to farm, out of fish stocks, out of forest... The solution is typically to work on the supply side and try to provide more. So we might develop systems to eek out a little more grain from the land, a little more fish from the sea, a little more energy efficiency ... but frequently these solutions feed back in ways that enhance other problems, and they're not keeping pace with increasing population. There is no good reason to not instead work on the demand side. Reducing per capita resource use by simplifying lifestyles will help to reduce demand, but can't possibly do all the work if we're to remain 6-12 billion. It seems that we can have 12 billion humans who live in a damaged ecosystem under pre-industrial conditions, 6 billion humans who live simple, restricted lives routinely teetering on the edge of eco-collapse, or 1-2 billion humans with no space or resource limitations who can continue to advance technologically and live in harmony with their healthy ecosystem. SOLUTION: Slow population growth to stabilize on the smallest possible 6+ billion population, and then hopefully go through a period of contraction until the human population of the Earth is 1-2 billion. Keep it there! Surely every problem arising from a resource limit can be solved by changing the three factors of demand: population, efficiency, and conservation. And conveniently these factors interact in a multiplicative way, so that (for instance) decreasing population by 1/2, conserving by decreasing resource use cases to 1/2, and increasing efficiency by 2x produces a net drop to 1/8 of our previous resource use, allowing the supply-side solutions to work on a much smaller resource requirement problem. # people * (resource use/person) * (utility/resource use) = demand = supply ACTION ITEMS: (a) Have 0-2 children. (b) Foster the social norm of having 0-2 children. (c) Foster the concept that it's possible and just and compassionate and makes sense to work to engineer ourselves an optimal population size. Foster the conversation about how to do this without coercive interference into the creative and difficult work of raising children. (4) We have a damaged and incoherent view of "Intellectual Property". "Property" is a terrible metaphor for ideas or information (software, music, text, film) in the first place because it relies on the exclusivity of possession: when I give you my property, I no longer have it. This in not true of information. The only thing I lose when I give away my ideas is the exclusive right to control and profit from them. CORE BECAUSE: Many recent technological innovations in our new "information age" are, at root, ideas or information that would benefit far more of society far more quickly if they could be used and extended without restriction. These innovations can increase economic efficiency and improve quality of life for everyone. Other forms of information could more broadly educate or entertain if they were freed. SOLUTION: Information creators should free their creations to be used and extended by others. In cases when they are unlikely to do this or where it would actually hinder productivity, their work should be protected by copyright or patent for an optimal 14 years, no more. This term balances society's interest in rewarding creators (with limited exclusive rights to control and profit from their creations) with its interest in making the broadest, quickest use of humanity's creativity to serve all. ACTION ITEMS: (a) Use and propagate free software and other free information using licenses like the GPL and Creative Commons licenses. (b) Lobby the government to restrict copyright and patent protection to 14 years.